Penguin and Panda have touched a number of freelance writers income. A difference in passive income for writers received from online platforms or writing sites like Hubpages most especially can be felt. Although writers have not changed how they are submitting content for publication with how they use search engine optimization or keywords utilization, they are still being punished in a variety of forms financially with search engine algorithm changes. Hubpages has made a lot of changes with Penguin and Panda alterations that are hurting their writers financially.
The initial modifications that Google made are nothing compared to Penguin and Panda when it comes to affecting a writers wallet contents. Writing sites like Hubpages were dinged when Google released their first algorithm modification and immediately began to clean house. Writers were fired and lots of content that was deemed subpar removed from their site. Cleaning house may have been necessary for some time in a lot of cases and was warranted.
One of the best things about writing for Hubpages was their earning potential. Hubpages did have one of the highest quality thresholds for accepting content and had a track record of getting great content out to the search engines. With referrals from other writers and submitting terrific content a great writer had the opportunity to earn an excellent online income from creating wonderful work. This seems to have changed with Penguin and Panda and how the site has accepted the changes Google put into place.
First changes to Hubpages
Hubpages made their first changes with removing inadequate content from the web along with removing writers that were not up to quality standards. This had a positive affect all around with the type of writing or work found with the online writing site.
Less substandard work left more room for great relevant content to be seen by readers. More page views meant making more money online from writing sites like Hubpages. Although Google conversions were made, all around quality written work was not disturbed.
Changes after Panda to Hubpages
Panda rolled out and Hubpages tightened the reigns once again. They reviewed content and for the content that did not make the cut, once again they cleaned house. This particular elimination of content and writers was not as substantial as the initial ejections. Though, they still wanted to maintain their page ranking as a writing site with Google and other search engines.
Changes after Penguin to Hubpages
Changes made to Hubpages after Penguin have deleted so much content that many writers have stopped submitting articles to the site and have seen a substantial drop in their passive income. Penguin changes made loads of articles unavailable to search engines by Hubpages and their review process for articles has become confusing to say the least.
Articles previously viewable to search engines became inaccessible or removed entirely as part of the Hubpages changes. Additionally, an article that was accessible to search engines that writer’s edited for minor changes was also removed. Numerous changes were not made to the overall content when edited, but they were removed nonetheless.
For an example, an article receiving great views per day or week that may have had a picture added was deemed unsuitable when republished. Reponses for the denial have been confusing. The responses from Hubpages writer received indicated there are too many keywords, there are too many Amazon items tied to the article or back links are not acceptable. This is more than puzzling since the same seo and keywords as well as back link methods have been used continually by the writer. Not only for the article they cannot publish, but for similar articles that are being published.
New Quality Assessment Process from Hubpages
Recently Hubpages has revealed a new quality assessment process they have personally developed for their published articles. This means they are reviewing articles one by one with Hubpages editors. Along with editors reviewing an article, fellow writers are also weighing in their two cents worth on each Hub or article with their Hopper device. Articles are rated up or down and a personal comment of useful, beautiful, awesome, funny or interesting can also be added. An automated metrics, similar to a Google algorithm is used for each Hub. Not only is this review conducted for new articles, but older articles are also going to be run through the matrix and can be removed from being shown to search engines.
One of the most difficult tasks with making any modifications to an article is the feedback provided is not detailed enough. The response from the computer generated feedback is general in nature and they are selected from one of several on file. Editors that review Hubs do not give detailed responses either. A Hub can be denied publication with something as general as “too many links”. This could mean that an added link URL for a pic or image is one too many, a back link in your article isn’t adequate. You used a name of a website with .com in your written material and should not have or your Amazon or EBay capsules are included as links and too many of these are connected to a Hub.
Imagine having hundreds of articles that are earning a great passive income monthly for a freelance writer that are suddenly removed from search engines. The results can be devastating financially. Attempting to rewrite, correct or alter these to fit the new standards is a daunting task to say the least. Depending on the amount of articles it can seem nearly impossible.
Writers that want to continue a passive writing financial relationship with Hubpages may find it difficult with Panda and Penguin now in the mix. Google’s algorithms were confusing in their administration and the same thing is being seen with Hubpages and the changes they have implemented to make their website adhere to these new standards.
In conclusion
Although a writer can agree Hubpages should publish quality content, this must be done with a clear and concise manner. It should happen in a way that is easy to understand, clear-cut and to the point as well as impartial and fair. Is this happening? If you are a member of Hubpages and have experienced confusing, unjust or biased reviews of your work, please share your experience with us. Unbiased, rational and objective reviews should be made for all writing submitted to sites such as Hubpages. Unfortunately, Hubpages attempting to comply with Penguin and Panda could cost them a lot of extraordinary writers and content that will be published elsewhere.
Hubpages is making a lot of changes, but they are not alone. Similar writing sites are also moving in the same direction. If you have an interest in working with me at Hubpages, please use this referral
No comments:
Post a Comment